PRATHA BAKSHI
INTERN AT Lexis And Company
Email- rashisinghbakshi@gmail.com
Contact number – 8253040077
TASK 10
HOW TO GET OUT OFF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: LEGAL
SOLUTIONS AND WAYOUTS
FACTS-
M/S India Chemicals is a supplier of xyz chemical to Suncare Pharma,
which is used to make certain medicines
M/S India Chemicals had an agreement for timely supply of the said
chemicals.
The said agreement has a clause if your client fails to supply the chemicals
in time, Suncare will suffer huge loss and as such on this account Rs.50
lakhs.
During the National Lockdown in March 2020, labourers working at M/S
India Chemicals left the factory and further, the raw material chain was
disrupted and as such M/S India Chemicals failed to supply chemicals to
Suncare Pharma.
There was huge demand for medicines during that period.
Suncare Pharma could also not produce and there by suffered huge loss in
crores.
Now Suncare Pharma has demanded Rs.10 lakhs from M/S India Chemicals
in terms of the agreement
ISSUES-
Under the given facts and circumstances, is it possible to get out the contractual
obligations for M/S India Chemicals?
ANSWER-
Yes, M/S India Chemicals can get out of this contractual obligations because the
corona pandemic and the lockdown was not foreseen so, M/S India Chemicals was
not ready to bear the risk so M/S India Chemicals can use section 56 of Indian
Contract Act- 56. Agreement to do impossible act. — An agreement to do an act
impossible in itself is void. — an agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void."
Contract to do act afterwards becoming impossible or unlawful.—A contract to do
an act which, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some
event which the promisor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act
becomes impossible or unlawful.1 —A contract to do an act which, after the
contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some event which the
promisor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes
impossible or unlawful.2" Compensation for loss through non-performance of act
known to be impossible or unlawful.—Where one person has promised to do
something which he knew, or, with reasonable diligence, might have known, and
which the promisee did not know, to be impossible or unlawful, such promisor
must make compensation to such promisee for any loss which such promisee
sustains through the non-performance of the promise. —where one person has
promised to do something which he knew, or, with reasonable diligence, might
have known, and which the promisee did not know, to be impossible or unlawful,
such promisor must make compensation to such promisee for any loss which such
promisee sustains through the non-performance of the promise."
Comments
Post a Comment